Hmmm. Not exactly sure how to respond to this one. While of course everyone touts their scalability and reliability as important components of their interconnect voice solution, how many actually can deliver on it?
Oh. Oh my. Umm…as Tom Hanks said in that movie Apollo 13, “Houston, we have a problem”. If the answer to “what is the importance of code based routing and rating?” is still unknown, then we do have a problem.
You sly dogs! That’s a good question. We always talk about our scalability & reliability and, of course, our speed, but those are only tangible if you have used a platform that is unreliable, doesn’t scale well, or operates slow (of which there are a lot of you). Something that GCS does really, really well is our rating process.
GCS is in the business of interconnect voice. We live and breathe this stuff all day, every day (exciting lives we lead, right?). So, rate management/administration is an important part of interconnect voice operations.
Ooh. Okay. This is an interesting topic for me. I have seen repeated instances of it and it kind of makes me scratch my head. The idea behind this is that a carrier that is proficient in interconnect voice offers to perform some, most, or even all of the interconnect voice operations for a carrier and charge them just a “small” per minute or per month management fee.
Nice question. Well, we get lots of carriers asking us lots of questions about specific features that we have, don’t have, or are planning to have. Some are really great questions. Some questions, let’s just say, they are, in a word, “wacky”.